Manual claims processing delays fab tools recovery by days while your backlog grows—automation cuts that to minutes.
Automate warranty claims processing by using AI to verify entitlements instantly, auto-code claims, detect fraudulent returns, and generate RMAs—eliminating manual data entry while reducing NFF rates and processing time from days to minutes.
Switching between warranty systems, equipment databases, and service histories to verify coverage wastes hours daily. Each claim requires checking multiple screens before you can even start processing.
Manually categorizing failure modes, selecting codes from dropdown menus, and filling out disposition forms turns every return into data entry work instead of decision-making.
Without automated fraud detection, invalid claims slip through—expired warranties get approved, NFF units trigger refunds, and patterns go unnoticed until quarterly reviews reveal the damage.
The platform automates the entire claims lifecycle from submission to RMA generation. When a return request arrives, AI instantly verifies entitlement against warranty records, automatically codes the claim based on failure description and equipment history, flags suspicious patterns, and generates the RMA—presenting you with a complete resolution case ready for approval.
Instead of switching between ten systems to piece together warranty status, failure codes, and refurbishment routing, you review a single screen showing the AI's decision logic, supporting data, and recommended action. Approve valid claims in seconds. Investigate flagged anomalies with all context pre-assembled. Your role shifts from data entry to decision validation.
Automatically classify and code warranty claims for etch tools, lithography systems, and metrology equipment—eliminating manual dropdown selection and reducing coding errors.
AI analyzes microscopic images from returned wafer handling systems to validate defect claims, classify failure modes, and accelerate adjudication decisions.
Semiconductor equipment returns carry extreme urgency—every day a lithography system or etch tool sits in RMA limbo costs the fab millions in lost throughput. Automated claims processing verifies warranty coverage for chamber kits, RF generators, and metrology components instantly, routes refurbishment decisions based on equipment criticality, and prioritizes fast-track processing for production-critical tools.
The platform integrates with your ERP to pull equipment install dates, PM schedules, and consumable replacement history—automatically validating whether a chamber kit failure falls within warranty or represents normal wear. For NFF cases, AI cross-references process telemetry from the tool's last run cycle to determine if operator error or recipe drift caused the perceived failure, preventing invalid returns before they ship.
The platform connects to your warranty database and equipment records to automatically cross-reference serial numbers, install dates, and coverage terms. When a claim arrives, AI instantly validates entitlement status and remaining coverage—eliminating manual system switching.
Flagged claims appear in your review queue with all supporting context pre-assembled: equipment history, previous returns, failure pattern analysis, and the specific anomaly detected. You investigate with full visibility rather than starting from scratch.
Yes. The platform learns from your existing claims history to map failure descriptions to your internal coding taxonomy. You can adjust confidence thresholds, add custom validation rules, and flag specific equipment types for manual review.
Automated entitlement verification, failure coding, and RMA generation typically complete in under 2 minutes per claim. You spend those 2 minutes reviewing AI recommendations rather than performing manual data entry across multiple systems.
Yes. AI cross-references equipment telemetry, PM history, and failure descriptions before approving RMAs—catching invalid returns caused by operator error, recipe drift, or normal wear. Customers typically see 30-40% NFF reduction within the first quarter.
Software stocks lost nearly $1 trillion in value despite strong quarters. AI represents a paradigm shift, not an incremental software improvement.
Function-scoped AI improves local efficiency but workflow-native AI changes cost-to-serve. The P&L impact lives in the workflow itself.
Five key shifts from deploying nearly 100 enterprise AI workflow solutions and the GTM changes required to win in 2026.
See how Bruviti automates warranty workflows for semiconductor equipment OEMs—from entitlement verification to RMA generation.
Schedule Demo